OM System OM-1 Vs Fujifilm XT4

Smaller sensors make smaller cameras, which is good for people who want a compact device. The OM System OM-1 Vs Fujifilm XT4 are compact but powerful systems for hybrid users who need a solid camera for still and video recording. While they use different sensors, the abilities are similar, so let’s see what the two can offer and the differences to decide the better choice.

In this comparison, we will talk about the following:

  • What are the OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4?
  • How is the Design of OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4?
  • How is the Image Quality from OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4?
  • How is the Autofocus in OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4?
  • How is the Video Recording in OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4?
  • OM System OM-1 Vs Fujifilm XT4
  • Which Mirrorless Camera to Buy?
OM System OM-1Fujifilm XT4
Product Dimensions 5.3 x 3.6 x 2.9 inches
3.65 x 5.3 x 2.51 inches
Shipping Weight 7.4 ounces
21.4 ounces
Shop now at Amazon

check here

check here

About the OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4

Do you need a new camera? The OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4 are some of the best options today as they are versatile yet compact. One of the main differences between these cameras is the sensor because one is a micro-four-third, and the other is an APS-C which means bigger in area. Generally, the bigger sensor is better for capturing more light, resulting in better performance in low-light situations, but it makes the cameras bigger and often more expensive. Read also: OM System OM-1 Vs Canon R6.

The OM-1 from OM System came last year, while XT4 has been around since 2020, so it is also more expensive. Older cameras lose the price as the company releases new models to compete with the market, but XT4 is still one of the best in its game. The other difference between these cameras is performance, especially when tracking the subject. The OM-1 is an impressive camera and probably one of the best in the micro four-thirds category. Still, it competes with many APS-C models with similar or even better autofocus, like XT4 and Sony Alpha series.

The OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4 are versatile cameras for hybrid users because they are also powerful when recording videos. Both cameras record 10-bit videos and 4K60, making them some of the top contenders in this category. The choice depends on the user’s preference because OM-1 is fantastic if you already have the lenses. On the other hand, the XT-4 is still the crowd’s favorite at a lower price and possibly better low-light performance.

OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4 Design

One common reason the OM-1 is a popular model is its compact body; this camera is slightly smaller and lighter than XT4, which is already compact for an APS-C. The handling is also good, but these two are small cameras, so those with large hands may find it difficult to hold them properly. The rear panel articulates so that you can record or shoot at different angles. They also face the subject when doing video recording. The EVF is in the middle for ergonomics, and the OM-1 has the crisper, the best EVF we have seen in a micro-four-third camera.

OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4 Image Quality

Let’s start with the sensor because it is a crucial difference between OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4. The OM-1 uses a 20MP micro four-third sensor, while the XT4 has a 26MP APS-C sensor. The specs mean nothing without seeing the images, which are different. The difference in the color profile is prominent in different cameras, but the resolution is visibly sharper on the XT4. The XT4 has a more prominent color than OM-1 when capturing JPEG, and the noise level is lower.

The skin tone differs for portraits because the images from XT4 are prominent on the red side, while the OM-1 is more yellow to neutral. The ISO performance is also different because XT.4 has a larger sensor, and it works better at higher ISO levels than OM-1 by providing more information and less noise. Overall, the image quality from both cameras is impressive, and they also have internal image stabilization, so you can still rely on handheld mode.

OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4 Autofocus

Next is autofocus because it is equally crucial for the best experience and image quality. Autofocus always keeps your image in focus, and like most cameras, there are many modes to choose from. The overall performance is good as both cameras are reliable with hybrid systems, combining contrast and phase detection. However, the OM-1 has more autofocus points than XT4 which may benefit its responsiveness. The XT4 is one of the best APS-C cameras, competing with similar offerings from Sony, like the a6600.

The OM-1 surprisingly falls short when sticking to the subject, unlike the APS-C rivals, but the system is fast enough to always catch up with the movement. For example, if you want to snap a picture of a small bird on a branch, both cameras will handle the focus well, with some help. But, while the XT4 sticks to the bird, the OM-1 tends to back and forth on its focus, which can be frustrating. Still, these cameras are excellent for most people, yet you will also find better autofocus, like the Canon R5. Read also: Canon EOS R10 Vs Sony a6500.

OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4 Video Recording

Lastly, we want to see the video recording ability on OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4. As mentioned above, both cameras record 4K60 and 10-bit videos, so they should fit in most applications, including a true hybrid user. The main difference is in the handling because the handling is slightly different. The OM-1 included headphones and a microphone jack, while the XT4 only has one. The headphone jack in XT4 is possible through a battery grip, which not everyone wants to invest in.

OM System OM-1 Vs Fujifilm XT4

The OM System OM-1 and Fujifilm XT4 are good cameras for what they can offer, but they are also different. The OM-1 is an excellent choice for the micro four-third category but is not the best across the competition with other sensors. This camera is lighter and more compact than XT4. It also has a headphone jack without a battery grip. However, it is pricier and does not significantly improve the image quality on both stills and videos, compared to the XT4.

- Native sensitivity range from ISO 200-102400, expandable down to ISO 80.
- Continuous shooting up to 10 fps with full-time AF/AE and a buffer of 169 raw frames when working with a mechanical shutter.
- Image Stabilization and Computational Photography 5-Axis Image Stabilization
- DCI/UHD 4K video recording is supported at up to 60p and 10-bit 4:2:0 sampling. Full HD recording is possible at high-speed rates up to 240 fps for slow-motion playback.
- Putting stability in your hands: A huge part of creating great photos or videos is making sure you are in the right place at the right time – and that often means making handheld images to get to the heart of the action. X-T4’s state-of-the-art, five-axis In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS) provides up to 6.5 stops of image stabilization to make sure that, even in the midst of all the excitement, your images remain steady and sharp. Combine this with the new four-axis digital image stabilizer, and you have lots of room to maneuver.
- Performance you can rely on: For any serious image maker, having a tool that can be relied upon to perform flawlessly whenever it is required is extremely important. For this reason, X-T4 features a newly developed mechanical shutter that is the fastest and most robust in the history of the X series. Not only can it make images at 15 frames per second, but it is also rated for 300,000 actuations 2. When you combine this with its larger capacity battery that is capable of up to 600 frames per charge 2, X-T4 has the power and the durability to give you the peace of mind that you’ll never miss the perfect opportunity.
- Find the best angle for your story: When chasing the perfect image, versatility is key, so the last thing you want is to be hampered by awkward angles. The 1.62 million pixel vari-angle touchscreen LCD featured on X-T4 can be adjusted to make it visible from a wide range of positions. This not only gives you a high-quality monitor to frame with, but also provides quick and simple controls when you need them most. On the flip side, there are times when you need to minimize the light and distractions that a screen can create. That’s why X-T4’s LCD has been designed to easily fold away so it is completely hidden from view, leaving the updated 3.69 million pixel/100fps electronic viewfinder to help you focus on the moment at hand.
- When your story needs movement: The modern image maker is blurring the lines between photography and videography, and X-T4 has been designed to celebrate this new generation of hybrid creativity. With the simple flick of a switch, movie mode is activated, meaning X-T4 is capable of recording both professional-level DCI 4K/60p and Full HD/240p super slow-motion video. It is also possible to record F-Log footage in 10-bit color, straight to the card. What’s more, the innovative AF-C subject tracking works in low-light conditions down to -6EV and the camera’s use of a new, high capacity battery lets you push your creative limits.


The decision is yours because we may have different preferences. The OM-1 is a good camera and powerful for hybrid users, but only better than XT4 if you already have the lenses. On the other hand, the XT4 has a better performance overall, minus the headphone jack, and is cheaper. It is also the best choice if you already have the lenses or are okay with the headphone jack and its slightly bulky body.

Leave a Comment